Think of the company as a bus you are deciding whether to buy a seat on. The tabs walk you round it: what the bus is, who is driving and where they say they are going, whether it is roadworthy, what is in the tank, and whether the driver’s promises have held up. Then the subject changes. The last tabs are not about the bus at all — they are about what a seat costs, and what is on the road ahead. Each tab says at the top which of the two it is.
Stand at a toll booth on the busiest road in the world and watch the traffic: 3.7 billion cards, tapping at hundreds of millions of acceptance points, in more than 220 countries and territories, in more than 150 currencies — every figure in that sentence from the company’s own signed filings. Mastercard’s founding position is the one every investor should envy: it owns the road’s tollgate and nothing else. In its own sworn words, it does not issue the cards, does not extend the credit, does not earn the interest — the banks carry all of that. The booth just collects, on every tap, and the long migration of the world’s cash into taps has run for twenty years without a down year in the traffic.
Mastercard listed on the stock market in 2006. Guess who owned it for the forty years before that: a government, one founding family — or the banks themselves? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
The history that matters is one long handoff. For its first forty years Mastercard was a cooperative owned by the banks themselves — the booth belonged to the trucks. The 2006 stock-market listing set it free, and everything on this report’s charts happened after: profit per share compounding 17% a year for the last decade, the margin climbing from 53 to 60 cents on the dollar, the owner list shrinking by a fifth. Two chief executives have run the booth in the last fifteen years, both promoted from inside; the Leadership chapter reads their filed résumés — the machine trains its own drivers, and the handoffs changed nothing that mattered.
Two windows on one booth, and the certified filing splits them cleanly:
So who writes the cheques? Nobody, and everybody — that is the beauty of a booth. No customer list to concentrate, no five names paying half the bill: the fee rides on $2.9 trillion of quarterly spending by billions of cardholders at millions of merchants, split among thousands of banks. What CAN concentrate is the road itself: cross-border traffic — travellers, the highest-margin tolls on the road and the first to stop in a crisis, as 2020 proved — grew 12% this quarter, the fastest of the three dials. The demand here is not a customer’s order book; it is the world’s willingness to keep replacing cash with taps — a migration now in its third decade.
Then there is the stock, which just had the quietest strange year on our shelf. Over twelve months the business grew its profit +23% — and the share price netted -1%. No crash, no drama: the crowd simply declined, for a year, to pay for a fifth more earnings, and so the price of a profit dollar drifted from about $33 at the August peak to $31 today — 14% below this company’s own five-year usual charge. The honest footnote: that “usual” contains the 2020 paradox, when the crowd paid its richest tags in the business’s worst year. Record earnings, a standstill price, a below-normal tag on a paradox-inflated normal: hold all three, because the Valuation chapter weighs them one at a time.
What decides where this goes? Three things, all on the record, all datable. First, October 29 — the next certified quarter, where the three traffic dials the release prints every quarter get graded first. Second, the September trial — the interchange docket’s next dated test, with Block and Intuit’s $5 billion claim behind it. Third, the rebates ledger — the discounts outgrowing revenue, quarter after quarter; the margin is the machine, and the haggling is its one visible tax. None of the three is flashing today. All three belong on a calendar.
Return on invested capital as our data provider computes it — one definition applied to every year, so the years are comparable with each other.
One road. One booth. Two windows. The machine is as close to friction-free compounding as public markets offer — which is exactly why its enemies are courts and regulators rather than competitors, and why the tolls have been litigated for twenty-one years. The rest of this report asks one question about that trade: with the tag below its own normal for the first time in years, are you being paid enough to hold what they signed?
The bottom line. Mastercard is one of the finest business machines on any exchange: a fee on every tap of 3.7 billion cards, 60-cent operating margins, half of every revenue dollar surviving as free cash, and a 17%-a-year profit staircase with a single shallow landing. The filings say the machine is intact (every link of the amplifier chain certified, the second window compounding); the decade says the E is a staircase with one shallow landing; the price (flat for a year, 14% below its own usual multiple) says the crowd has stopped paying up for it. Whoever buys this share is buying the signed ledger of a booth the courts and regulators have argued with for twenty-one years — with management’s own words as the map. October 29 gives the next honest reading.
This half-year Mastercard collected $6.8 billion of cash from operations — and mailed $10.5 billion out to owners, borrowing the difference on purpose. That arithmetic is either alarming or brilliant, and the answer lives in one number: nearly HALF of every revenue dollar here survives as free cash. This chapter weighs the machine, the mortgage, and the choice.
Mastercard carries $24.6 billion of debt and holds $11.3 billion of cash. Guess how long its tolls would take to clear the difference: about five years, about three — or less than one? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
A balance sheet plays defense and offense: survive trouble, and fund the plan from its own cash — not by piling on debt or selling new shares. This chapter checks the frame: is MA built to go the distance?
Start with how the money moved this half, because a bank account cannot be embellished. $6.77 billion came in from operations — slightly less than last year’s half, for reasons the Earnings chapter counts honestly. Capital spending took $0.8 billion — a toll booth needs computers, not factories. And then the choice: $8.9 billion bought back shares, $1.5 billion paid dividends — together MORE than the half’s operating cash — and $5.6 billion of new notes were sold to cover the gap. Nothing was hidden about it; the certified cash-flow page prints all four lines in one column.CAME IN$6.77Bcash from operations, six months, as certifiedOUT TO OWNERS$10.5Bbuybacks plus dividends — more than came in, by choiceBORROWED$5.6Bnew notes sold in the half — the gap, funded at fixed rates
Read each like a price chart. The actual metric (solid line, green when rising / red when falling) is plotted with its trend line (grey dashed) on the same axis. On mean-reverting metrics like margins and returns, a tinted band also marks the level versus the metric's own ten-year median; on cumulative-dollar metrics like free cash flow that band carries no signal, so it's omitted.
What was left over each year after paying for everything: from $3.70B a decade ago to $15.8 billion in the last twelve months. Notice the shape: one shallow dent in 2020, then straight back to the staircase — the cash line of a business whose product is a fee on transactions that happen regardless of the news, collected through a booth that was already built.
Of every dollar Mastercard collected this past year, about 49 cents survived as money it could spend on anything. Very few businesses anywhere convert like that, and it is the number that makes the leverage policy possible: a booth that keeps half of what it collects can carry a mortgage, mail out billions, and still grow. When this dial slips, the policy gets dangerous — that is the order to check things in.
The two-to-one current-ratio test was written for businesses with warehouses — inventory that must be financed before it sells. A toll booth carries no inventory at all; its current liabilities are dominated by tolls in transit for a few days, matched by settlement assets opposite, plus the rebates owed to its biggest customers. We show the test because we show it for every company, and we tell you plainly when its letter misleads: the solvency that matters here is the mortgage against the cash engine, and that reads under one year.
Here is the receipt this chapter stands on — one certified paragraph, four numbers. The 10-Q’s buyback note prints the board’s standing orders: $12.0 billion authorized in December 2024, $14.0 billion more in December 2025. It then counts the balance to the week: $8.5 billion remaining at June 30 — and, through July 27, another $0.7 billion spent, leaving $7.8 billion. Boards that intend to keep buying tell you so in exactly this dialect: not a promise, a standing order with a running meter. Set beside it the half’s other financing line — $5.6 billion of new notes sold, zero repaid — and the policy is legible: borrow at fixed rates, retire shares at whatever the crowd charges, let the cash engine carry both. It has, so far, every year.
The best clue to what this management believes: for a decade, nearly everything has gone back to owners. Last calendar year alone, $11.5 billion of buybacks and $2.8 billion of dividends on our provider’s series — and the dividend itself has been raised every year on this chart, $2.37 to $2.74 to $3.15 declared per share in the last three. A company that returns more than it makes is making a statement: it believes the booth needs almost nothing — and it would rather shrink the owner list than let cash pile up. The risk in that statement is priced debt; the record so far is a mortgage under one year of free cash.
What happens in a bad year?
Now the storm question. The test below replays the worst margin of the last 5 completed years — and on this company the striking thing is how little a “worst year” changes. For the real storm, look at 2020: the borders closed, the most profitable traffic on the road stopped overnight, and the operating margin gave back about 4 cents on the dollar — then took two years to win them back. The booth’s worst recorded weather is a drizzle:
That is what shallow bad years mean in numbers: through a repeat of anything on the recent record, the cash keeps arriving at five times the dividend bill — and the buyback, unlike a dividend, can simply pause. That is the safety valve in the return-more-than-you-make policy: the biggest cheque is optional every single quarter, and nobody calls a paused buyback a cut.
The test, declared: we take the worst operating margin in our data provider’s record of the last 5 years — 54% in 2021, against 59% today — and apply it to today’s revenue. Cash from the business is scaled by the same ratio, which is an approximation rather than an arithmetic certainty; it is the one estimate on this page and we would rather name it than bury it. Nothing here is a forecast: it is their own bad year, replayed against their own current bills.
How it adds up — can they pay for the plan?
Now the whole story, in one telling. Mastercard is a toll booth that keeps nearly half of every dollar it collects — $15.8 billion of free cash in the trailing year — and a management that mails essentially all of it, plus borrowed money, out to owners: $10.5 billion returned against $6.8 billion collected this half, with $5.6 billion of new fixed-rate notes covering the difference.
The honest cards stay on the table: the book value is an accounting residue — goodwill alone exceeds it; the Graham test fails on its letter; operating cash dipped this half on prepaid incentives; and $13 billion of net debt is real borrowing, chosen, not needed.
So: is Mastercard financially strong? The engine is among the strongest we have ever put on a page — the policy spends that strength deliberately close to the line. What would change our reading: the free-cash margin slipping while the borrowing pace held. The dials for both are above, and the next certified reading is October 29.
A promise, on this page, means one thing: a number, written in a filing, for a stated period, that can be checked later against another filing. Not a direction. Not a tone of voice. Not something said on a call and never written down. Companies are free to say as much or as little as they like, and what a management chooses to put in writing — where it can be held to it — tells you something the numbers alone will not.
What they will not put in writing
The promises they DO put paper behind
| When | The promise | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| Every quarter | a cash dividend, declared in advance — raised every year: $2.37 → $2.74 → $3.15 declared per share | Paid, every time — $1.5B of cheques this half, on the certified cash-flow page |
| December 2024, December 2025 | the board’s standing buyback orders — $12B, then $14B more, authorized in writing | Being executed, with a running meter — $7.8B left at July 27, counted in the filing itself |
| Every release | the same three dials, printed without fail: spending volume, cross-border, switched transactions | This quarter: +8%, +12%, +9% — gradeable against October 29’s printing |
Why any of this matters
Both lines from one data pull: month-end share prices, and twelve-month earnings per share scaled to the share price at the window’s start. Nothing here is a forecast, a strategy or advice — two public paths on one axis.
How it adds up — can you take them at their word?
Now the whole chapter, in one telling. The word Mastercard gives you in writing is small and specific: a dividend declared before it is paid, raised $2.37 to $2.74 to $3.15; a buyback authorized in billions and metered to the week; three traffic dials printed every quarter without fail. Every one of those paper promises has been kept, on the record. The bigger promise — the year ahead — is spoken, not signed, and we decline to grade what cannot be checked. So: can you take them at their word? On paper, yes — the paper promises run like the machine they describe. For everything else there is the delivery record: a decade in which the share earned almost exactly what the earnings handed it. The next certified reading is October 29, and the three dials get graded first.
Card traffic through the booth grew 8% this quarter. Profit per share grew 22%. The distance between those two numbers is the whole Mastercard machine — a chain of amplifiers, each one certified — and this chapter walks it link by link, then shows you the seven cents that separate the number they signed from the number they marketed.
Mastercard pays rebates and incentives to its biggest customers. Guess how fast those grew this quarter, against revenue up 14%: slower than revenue, about as fast — or faster? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
Earnings are built just three ways: more revenue × wider margins × fewer shares. This chapter takes them one at a time — and then asks the harder question, which is whether the profit figure at the end is one an owner could actually count. Here is MA’s engine.
Read it like a price chart. The actual metric (solid line, green when rising / red when falling) is plotted with its moving-average trend line (grey dashed) on the same axis — the fundamental version of a price and its 200-day average. The tag (uptrend / downtrend / range-bound) reads where the actual sits relative to that trend line. On mean-reverting metrics like margins, a tinted band also marks the level versus the metric's own 10-year median; on figures that only ever climb, like revenue and profit per share, that band tells you nothing, so we leave it off.
A decade ago Mastercard collected $9.67B of net revenue a year; the trailing twelve months collected $35.1 billion. No acquisintion spree did that — the booth simply sits on a road where traffic compounds: more cards, more countries, more of the world’s cash turning into taps, and now a second window selling services to the same queue. The latest four quarters put 16% on the top line, and the certified split says the second window is the faster of the two.
From $3.35 to $18.18 of trailing profit per share in about a decade — roughly 17% a year, compounded. Study the one landing on this staircase: 2020, when the borders closed and the most profitable traffic on the road — travellers spending abroad — stopped overnight. Profit per share gave back about a fifth. It took exactly one year to reclaim the step and keep climbing. That landing is the honest answer to “what happens to this company in a crisis”: the tolls dip with the traffic, and the traffic has always come back.
Of each revenue dollar, Mastercard keeps about 59 cents as operating profit on the trailing year, as our data provider reports it — up from 53 cents ten years ago, and last calendar year’s 60 cents was the best of the decade. The margin is the business model talking: the booth was built long ago, the road keeps getting busier, and extra traffic arrives almost free of extra cost. Even the dent reads well — in 2020, the worst year the road ever had, the margin gave back about 4 cents and recovered them within two.
The quiet amplifier: 1,116 million shares became 894 million over the decade — about 20% fewer owners to split every profit dollar across. This is bought, steadily: billions of dollars of the booth’s cash goes to repurchasing its own shares every year, $8.93B in this half alone. The Financial Condition chapter asks the honest question about how that pace is funded; this dial just records the effect — every per-share figure on this page climbed a fifth faster than the company itself did.
What an owner would count
The cash column deserves one honest wrinkle before the chart. In the first half of this year the business turned $6.77 billion of operations into cash — slightly LESS than the same half last year, even though profit rose 18%. The cause is on the certified cash-flow page: the booth pays its biggest fleets up front — prepaid customer incentives swung $3.8 billion of cash out the door ahead of the revenue they will earn — and $504 million of old litigation bills were paid. Timing, on the evidence, not decay — but it is the dial to re-check on October 29. The full-year picture is what the chart shows: almost half of every revenue dollar survives as free cash.
These two do not subtract to one another — free cash flow is operating cash less capital spending, not operating profit less capital spending. An owner’s real number sits between them: above the cash figure, because much of that spending is building new capacity rather than replacing worn-out capacity; below the profit figure, because some of it certainly is replacement. Separating the two is the one estimate this method says outright cannot be made precisely, and we do not print a figure we cannot stand behind. Our data carries neither the amortisation charge nor the cost of shares issued to staff; when it does, both will be shown here. Five completed years, one data provider’s run throughout.
How it adds up — and what it's done to the price
Now the whole quarter, in one telling. $2.9 trillion rolled through the booth; $9.3 billion stayed as net revenue, 14% more than a year ago; 60 cents of every dollar survived as operating profit; and $4.97 a share landed on owners, 22% more than last year — the amplifier chain, run once more, every link certified. The discounts to the biggest fleets grew faster than the tolls, the services window grew faster than the booth, and the signed number sits seven honest cents below the marketed one.
One line of arithmetic to carry to the valuation chapter: over the past year reported earnings rose +23%, the price paid for each dollar of them moved -19%, and the share price netted to -1%. The walker climbed a fifth; the dog stood still.
The figure to carry forward is $18.18 of trailing profit per share — the signed ledger, summed across the four certified quarters.
Over the past year Mastercard’s profit grew by more than a fifth and its share price went nowhere — so the price of a profit dollar here quietly fell by about a fifth, to 14% below what this company usually charges. No crash did that; patience did. Whether it makes the share cheap depends entirely on which yardstick you trust. This chapter hands you five.
In 2020 the borders closed and Mastercard’s profit fell a fifth. Guess what the crowd paid for a dollar of that profit: its lowest price of the decade, an ordinary one — or its richest? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
A great company and a great investment are not the same thing — the difference is exactly what you pay. So this chapter asks the plainest question in investing: at today’s price, is MA expensive, average, or on sale — and what has the market paid for this same profit before?
Shop the way you shop for groceries: by the unit price. A share of Mastercard costs $565 and holds $18.18 of last year’s profit — so a dollar of profit costs $31.10. At the late-August price peak the same dollar cost about $33.
The store’s usual charge, across five years: $36.20 — the dashed line on the chart below. Today’s tag sits 14% below it, at the 26th percentile of every day in this company’s own record. And notice HOW it got there — not by a crash, but by a year of the price refusing to follow the earnings up. The quiet discounts are the ones nobody writes headlines about.
One honest caution about the dashed line itself: five-year normals inherit their era. Mastercard’s contains the 2020 paradox — tags in the fifties, paid in the worst year the business ever had — which pulls the “normal” up. Strip the paradox out mentally and the mid-thirties of 2022–2025 look like the real recent verdict; today’s $31 sits below that too, but by less. Both readings are on the chart, and both are yours to weigh.
So what would keep even this tag too high? On the evidence of this report, two things: the regulator repricing the road — the Risk chapter’s second exhibit, and the one variable no ledger can model — or the rebates ledger (the discounts already outgrowing revenue) squeezing the margin the whole machine is priced on. A $31 tag prices a booth that keeps doing what this one has done for twenty years. That is the decision, and it is yours.
Compared to what?
| Compared to what? | This company | The yardstick | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Against its own five-year record The multiple this company has usually traded on, across five years of its own history. | 31.1 | 36.2 | 0.86×BELOW |
| Against its own recent trend The one-year moving average — where the multiple has sat over the last twelve months. | 31.1 | 32.1 | 0.97×BELOW |
| Against the 145 companies GARPify covers The median multiple across our universe; this company is 88 of 145 counting from the cheapest. The shelf is quality growth companies, not the market — cheap here means cheap against those. | 31.1 | 28.1 | 1.11×ABOVE |
| Against its own growth rate A fair multiple for a growing company is its growth rate. Earnings per share grew 17.3% a year from 2015 to 2025 — and the answer moves with that window. | 31.1 | 17.3% | 1.80ABOVE |
| Against the 10-year government bond The profit turned into a yield, set against what a government bond pays for doing nothing. Yield supplied 28 September 2026. | 3.22% | 5.200% | -1.98ptABOVE |
The first three can be run only on the reported earnings figure — it is the only one that exists for the other companies on the shelf and for this company’s own history. The last two are shown on both, because there the choice of earnings changes the answer, and a row marked SPLIT is one where the two disagree.
Read the split, and then weigh it. Two cheap readings: 0.86× its own five-year record (the paradox warning above), and 0.97× its own one-year trend — the crowd’s discount is real and still deepening. The three dear readings all look outside: 1.11× the median tag across the companies we cover (a shelf of quality companies, mind, not the market), 1.80 its own delivered ten-year growth rate, and a profit yield of 3.22% against a government bond’s 5.2% for doing nothing — the one yardstick no company controls. In plain words: by its own history this share is as inexpensive as it has been in years; by the world outside it, quality this proven has simply never gone on clearance.
What the Town Has Paid Before
The chart below is every price tag this store has hung on the same item — a dollar of Mastercard’s yearly profit — quarter by quarter since 2014, with the five-year typical charge drawn across it. One mirage to know about before reading it: the 2020 spike is partly arithmetic — the earnings under the fraction dipped a fifth while the price rose — and partly a genuine bet that the traffic would return. Every other stretch on it is honest crowd mood, hung on real and growing dollars.
This crowd has been wrong here in both directions — it paid its richest tags in the worst year, and its stingiest ones (the 2022 trough) two years before the earnings proved them wrong. Its current verdict — below normal while the earnings post records — says the crowd doubts the pace can hold. The filings, not the mood, will say.
Try it yourself:Turn a future profit into a future price — and try itThe same three steps as every valuation tab: your yearly profit for each share, times the unit price you would pay. Started for you: what a share earned over the last twelve months (the signed ledger), at Mastercard’s own five-year typical charge. Change either number and the price follows — try the mid-thirties tag of 2022–2025 and see what the paradox-free normal impliesYEARLY PROFIT FOR EACH SHARE, AFTER TAXTHE P/E YOU WOULD PAYYOUR PRICE FOR THE SHARE How it adds up — is the price fair?Now the whole story, in one telling. Over the past year this company’s profit grew a fifth and its share stood still, so the tag quietly compressed to $31.10 — 14% below its own five-year typical of $36.20, at the 26th percentile of its own recorded days. By its own history: as inexpensive as it has been in years, arrived at the honest way. By everything outside — the shelf, the growth arithmetic, the 5.2% bond — a premium tag on a premium machine, as ever. So: is the price fair? For the first time in years, this share costs less than its own record says is usual — and the whole argument is whether that record, paradox included, deserves the benefit of the doubt. The Risk chapter holds what could reprice the road; the Guidance chapter explains why no filed promise will help you time it. The evidence is above, and the vote is yours.
Nobody at this table founded the company, and nobody’s family controls it — Mastercard is the other kind of great machine: one handed from professional to professional, each of whom mostly grew up inside it. The chief executive ran product here before he ran the place; the CFO kept the treasury a decade before keeping the books. This chapter is about the stewards with your money — and the one habit that tells you most: what they do with the cash.
Guess what Mastercard’s results release says about next quarter’s and next year’s numbers: a range for each, a single target — or nothing at all? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
A company’s future earnings come from what its leaders actually do — the plan they set and their record of keeping it. This chapter reads the work: who runs the business, what they promise in writing, whether they keep their word, and whether the plan is still the same plan.
Who is driving the bus
Do they face the brutal facts?
Is it the same flywheel?
| Year | What they collected | Kept of each $1 | Slices of the pizza | Profit per slice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | $9.67B | 52.6¢ | 1,116M | $3.35 |
| 2019 | $16.88B | 57.5¢ | 1,007M | $7.94 |
| 2020 | $15.30B | 53.0¢ | 995M | $6.37 |
| 2022 | $22.22B | 56.6¢ | 956M | $10.23 |
| 2024 | $28.16B | 57.0¢ | 914M | $13.89 |
| 2025 | $32.84B | 60.1¢ | 894M | $16.52 |
Who actually decides
How it adds up — would you hire them?
One last look at the stewards. Two in-house chief executives running; a bench filed with ages and twenty-year histories; profit per share up nearly five times in ten years with no losing year; a fifth of the owner list retired; a dividend raised like a metronome — and a leverage policy that returns more than the machine makes, on purpose, which is the one genuinely aggressive habit on the page. Would you hire them? On the record, most owners already have, twice — through two successions that changed nothing that mattered. The cover chapter closes the report from here.
If you bought a toll bridge up in Muskoka, you’d read what the seller signed about the lawsuits, the township’s rate powers, and who covers a truck that crashes through the gate — and trust what he admitted over anything in the brochure. The law makes public-company bosses do exactly that: every year they write down what could badly hurt the business, and sign it. Below is Mastercard’s list, cut to the three passages that matter, with our highlighter on the words that carry the weight. Read the yellow; the rest is lawyers.
Mastercard’s own signed filing is quoted below. Guess how long merchants have been suing it over its fees: since last year, since the financial crisis — or since 2005, with a fresh case filed this April and a trial starting this September? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
The surest way to lose money is to settle on a view and stop hunting for the holes in it. So this chapter hunts: the handful of ways the story could fail, sized by how much each would hurt. The weighing is yours.
Charlie Munger kept one question above all the others: “All I want to know is where I’m going to die, so I’ll never go there.” This chapter is that map — drawn by an unusual cartographer. Not us: the management itself, under signature. We are only holding the highlighter.
Read the recovery carefully, because it is the easiest thing on this page to misread. No signature anywhere promises the crowd’s price. This past year the business earned a fifth more per share while the share itself went nowhere — the crowd can disagree with the ledger for a long time in either direction, and the Chart chapter is where we watch it. Plenty of businesses have fallen this far and never returned, and none of them appear in these reports. Nothing here promises a recovery. What the number does tell you is the size of the move you should expect to sit through, so that you decide now — not at the bottom — whether you could.
Also on their signed lists, weighed in other chapters or watched at the next filing: “substantial and intense competition worldwide” — including technology companies free “to use their own technology to compete against us”; cybersecurity, at a company whose product is trust in the rails; and the rebates and incentives ledger — the discounts to the biggest customers grew faster than revenue again this quarter (the Earnings chapter counts it). Quotations are verbatim from Mastercard’s Form 10-K for 2025 and Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, as deposited; highlighting is ours; ellipses mark omitted words, never altered ones. GARPify publishes research, not recommendations. Nothing on this page is advice.
Over the past year this business grew its profit by more than a fifth — and its share price went essentially nowhere. The walker has stopped: the one-year average path is dead flat over the last quarter, the dog circling around it — below through the middle months, out front since a late-August peak it now sits 6% beneath. This chapter measures the stall as it stands — and only that.
Guess what a Mastercard share was worth at the end of 2019, against the end of 2015: about the same, about twice as much — or about three times as much? Hold your answer — this chapter gives you the real one.
A man walks his dog through the park. The dog runs ahead, doubles back, disappears into the bushes, sprints to the fence and returns — covering four miles while the man covers one. Watch the dog and you learn almost nothing about where the pair is going. Watch the man.
On this page the man is the share’s one-year average path, and the dog is the daily price. Everything below measures the pair: how far the dog has run from the man, and which way the man is walking. It is an old market story, and it is the whole method of this chapter — which predicts nothing, because nothing honest can.
A chart cannot tell you what a business is worth. It can show the terms the market is offering today — how far the fare has run from where it has typically sat. Not prediction; just noticing, before conviction becomes a decision.
Picture a man walking a dog on a long lead. The man is the share’s own one-year average — slow, deliberate, hard to turn. The dog is the daily price: out front when the neighbourhood is exciting, sulking behind when it is not, never further than the lead allows for long. Everything on this tab is that walk, measured. It will not tell you where the pair are going — nothing honest can — but it tells you plainly where they are and which way the man is facing.
Today the dog stands 5% ahead of a walker who has stopped walking: the average path has moved -0.7% in a quarter — a rounding error. Read that beside the Earnings chapter and you have this report’s whole peculiarity: trailing profit up more than a fifth in a year, the share flat. The crowd has spent a year declining to pay for a fifth more earnings — which is another way of saying the tag got cut a fifth, and the Valuation chapter prices exactly that.
Two things worth your eye on the chart above. The middle months: the dog spent most of the year BELOW the path — 21 of 52 weeks above is a coin toss, not a trend — before coming back around in the late-summer run to the peak. And the line itself: flat. A price criss-crossing a flat average is the framework’s plainest picture of an undecided crowd.
One caution, repeated wherever charts appear: the walk describes the crowd, not the company. Nothing about the booth or the traffic changes because one line crosses another.
A History of Mastercard’s Technical Periods
The walk so far, in five stretches — every figure from the same price record:
How it adds up — where the walk standsNow the whole walk, in one telling. A dog 5% out front of a walker who has stopped — the average path flat over the quarter, 21 of 52 weeks above it, a late-August peak 6% overhead, volume about usual. This chart’s own record says the crowd here runs to long moods — a paradox year, two years of giving it back, three of quiet grinding — and that through every one of them the average path eventually followed the earnings. So: is the stall an ending, or a coiled spring? The chart cannot say, and neither can we. What it can say is where the question gets answered: at the flat line around $537, and at the October 29 filing that either hands the walker a reason to move or does not. Either way, nothing about the booth changes because one line crosses another — the company chapters write the answer first; this one just keeps the map. You may notice this is the one chapter that never quotes management — by design. Price is the only number in this report that nobody signs: the earnings are certified; the price is scribbled by the crowd, daily, in pencil. The dog never testifies.
| Section | Your Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Rate each section as you read — your results appear here automatically. | ||
Every number in this report is only useful if it changes how you make a decision. Most investors read, nod, and move on. The ones who build wealth over time do something different — they write things down.
Not because writing is the point. Because writing forces you to be honest with yourself. You cannot write "I believe this business will compound at 15% for the next decade" without immediately knowing whether you actually believe it.
There is a notes box at the foot of every tab in this report, and what you put in them lands in the table above. Use them as you read, not afterwards. GARPify has no opinion on what you should decide — that is your job, and none of the questions on this page have right answers.
Be honest. Nobody else is reading these.
Not Personalized Investment Advice
The content of this report is impersonal analytical research. It is general in nature and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation, risk tolerance, or particular needs of any specific person who may read it. Nothing in this report constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any security. Nothing in this report constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The analyses and observations in this report are presented to help readers form their own judgments about whether the securities discussed are appropriate for their own circumstances. Readers should consult their own registered investment advisor, portfolio manager, or other qualified financial professional before making any investment decision based on information contained in this report.
Registration Status
GARPify is not registered as an investment dealer, portfolio manager, exempt market dealer, or investment advisor with any provincial or territorial securities regulator in Canada, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or with any other securities regulator in any jurisdiction. GARPify operates as an impersonal financial publisher providing analytical research and commentary. GARPify does not provide personalized investment advice, manage client accounts, or hold client funds or securities.
Personal Holdings Disclosure
The author of GARPify research may from time to time hold positions in securities covered by GARPify reports. Specific holdings as of the publication date of this report: The author holds no personal position in MA. The author may buy or sell securities covered by GARPify reports at any time, subject to the trading restrictions described in the GARPify Code of Conduct, which prohibits trading in covered securities for a specified blackout period before and after publication of new or updated research on those securities.
Source of Data and Information
Quantitative data in this report is sourced from a professional market-data service and from the companies’ own regulatory filings. Specific data points are cited where they appear in the report. All data is current as of the publication date shown on the Cover tab. GARPify makes commercially reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the data presented but does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any data, content, or opinions in this report. Readers should verify any specific data point against primary sources before relying on it for any investment decision.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements about market conditions, business performance, valuation multiples, and potential investment outcomes. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by such statements. The forecast scenarios in this report represent conditional outcomes under specific stated assumptions. They are not predictions. Actual outcomes may differ materially. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Securities mentioned in this report can decline in value, and readers can lose money on investments in those securities.
Conflicts of Interest
GARPify is funded entirely by subscription revenue from its readers. GARPify accepts no advertising, sponsored content, paid placements, marketing support, or compensation of any kind from any company covered in its research, from any fund issuer, or from any intermediary that may distribute GARPify research. GARPify does not engage in investment banking, corporate finance advisory, brokerage, or any other business activity that would create a financial interest in the performance of securities covered in its research, other than the author's personal holdings disclosed above. GARPify research is selected, written, edited, and published solely by the GARPify author on an objective, documented methodology.