The Machine Behind Every Chip — GARPify Theme
GARPify We do the work. You do the thinking.
GARPify Theme
The Machine Behind Every Chip
Every chip on earth is built by machines from a handful of toolmakers — and three of them stand at the front of every process step: the inspector who catches what goes wrong, the sculptor who builds what must go right, and the generalist with a machine on almost every floor of the fab. All three now carry full GARPify reports. This summer the market marked all three down hard — and left every tag still far above its own history. This page is the map.
Data as of September 15, 2026  ·  Figures from the companies’ own annual filings and our standard data pull
Part one · The big story — where these three sit

The machine behind the boom — and the oven-maker’s problem

Everyone is building data centres — that is the story of this decade, and our master theme, the Data Centre Boom, tells it in full. This page sits one step up the supply chain: data centres are filled with chips, chips are made in fabs, and fabs are filled with these three companies’ machines. For sixty years, every advance in chips has meant more work for the machine makers. But a seat at the front of the chain cuts both ways. These are the city’s oven makers in a restaurant boom: as long as new restaurants open, the phone rings. The week the city decides it has enough restaurants, the ovens stop selling — even though every restaurant keeps serving dinner. In 2023 the chip industry merely paused for breath — and Lam’s sales fell 14% in two fiscal years.

The stock market has seen this movie. In March 2000 the most valuable company on earth was Cisco, seller of the internet buildout’s plumbing. The buildout slowed. Cisco’s business survived and kept growing — but a buyer of the shares at the 2000 peak waited twenty-five years, until December 2025, to get back to even. The end of a buildout doesn’t have to kill the builder. It kills the price people will pay for the builder.

So the question for these three is not whether a slowdown ever comes — someday one does — but what each company keeps earning when it arrives. Their money comes in two kinds. New-machine sales stop when the building stops. Service revenue — parts, upgrades, support on machines already installed — keeps arriving, boom or pause: it is the rent on the installed base.

Selling new machines vs servicing the installed ones — growth since fiscal 2023
From each company’s own filings. Hover a dot for the dollars.
New-machine sales Service revenue — parts, upgrades, support
KLA
0%FY23FY24FY25FY26KLA FY23: +0% vs FY23 ($8.4B)KLA FY24: -11% vs FY23 ($7.5B)KLA FY25: +13% vs FY23 ($9.5B)KLA FY26: +25% vs FY23 ($10.5B)+25%KLA FY23: +0% vs FY23 ($2.1B)KLA FY24: +10% vs FY23 ($2.3B)KLA FY25: +27% vs FY23 ($2.7B)KLA FY26: +48% vs FY23 ($3.1B)+48%
Lam
0%FY23FY24FY25FY26Lam FY23: +0% vs FY23 ($10.7B)Lam FY24: -17% vs FY23 ($8.9B)Lam FY25: +7% vs FY23 ($11.5B)Lam FY26: +39% vs FY23 ($14.9B)+39%Lam FY23: +0% vs FY23 ($6.7B)Lam FY24: -11% vs FY23 ($6.0B)Lam FY25: +3% vs FY23 ($6.9B)Lam FY26: +24% vs FY23 ($8.3B)+24%
Applied
0%FY23FY24FY25Applied FY23: +0% vs FY23 ($19.7B)Applied FY24: +1% vs FY23 ($19.9B)Applied FY25: +6% vs FY23 ($20.8B)+6%Applied FY23: +0% vs FY23 ($5.7B)Applied FY24: +9% vs FY23 ($6.2B)Applied FY25: +11% vs FY23 ($6.4B)+11%
The lesson is fiscal 2024: new-machine sales fell at both specialists — and KLA’s service revenue rose anyway. (Lam counts some equipment in its service line, so that line dipped with the cycle.) That is also the chart’s standing job: each annual report adds a dot, and the year new-machine sales turn down while service revenue holds is the turn this page exists to catch — the fabs’ guidance in Part four usually rings first. Sources: KLAC FY2026 10-K (income statement, p.50; fiscal 2023 from the FY2025 10-K); LRCX FY2026 10-K (Note 4, p.51; fiscal 2023 from the FY2024 10-K); AMAT FY2025 10-K (Applied’s figures are its two operating segments; a small corporate/display slice of about 4% of revenue is not shown). KLA and Lam fiscal years end in June; Applied’s ends in October and its next report lands November 12.

None of this is a forecast — the watch list in Part four is how a reader spots the turn. GARPify covers all three with full company reports — KLAC LRCX AMAT — built from the companies’ own filings and our standard data pull, every claim checked against its source, and no advice anywhere.

Part two · The present — the operators

Three toolmakers, three jobs, one summer

Think of a fab as a construction site: KLA is the building inspector, Lam the specialist mason, and Applied the general contractor with a crew on almost every floor. Three different businesses — and one summer that cut all three share prices by 38–45% from their 52-week highs while the order books stayed full.

The inspector · the undeferrable line item
REPORT LIVE
Every chip, at every fab, at every layer — dozens of times
Every chip manufactured anywhere passes through KLA’s inspection tools — a billion transistors is a billion places to fail, and a fab that skips yield checking ships scrap. That makes inspection the one line item a fab cannot defer: you can delay a new etch tool, but not finding out why your yield dropped. It is also the last thing cut when building slows — and it earns KLA the richest margins of the three. The report reads the franchise — and what a 45% fall from its 52-week high did and did not fix about its price.
FY2026 revenue
$13.6B
Service revenue
23¢ of each $1
The tag
45.8× vs 28.9 usual
The sculptor · the precision monopoly
REPORT LIVE
The only tools precise enough to stack memory hundreds of layers high
Before a transistor can be inspected it must be built — etched and deposited with sub-nanometre precision, hundreds of layers deep in modern memory. That is Lam’s aisle, and in much of it Lam sells the only tool that can do the job. Fiscal 2026 revenue reached $23.2B — more than half of it foundry work (54%), memory 39% — with the service revenue from its installed machines as the floor under the down years. The report tells the sculpture story and prices the most cyclical earnings of the three.
FY2026 revenue
$23.2B
Service revenue
36¢ of each $1
The tag
47.0× vs 26.6 usual
The generalist · the newest report
REPORT LIVE
Never a down year through the trough — run by a man who has worked both sides of the fab
Gary Dickerson spent eighteen years at KLA-Tencor — the inspection trade — then ran Varian, which Applied bought in 2011; two years later he was running Applied itself. It is the biggest toolmaker of the three ($28.4B in fiscal 2025) with the broadest toolset, and the steadiest: through the 2023 trough that dented both specialists, its revenue never fell. The quiet half: an order book carrying as much signed service work ($7.1B) as tool work ($7.1B) — machines sell once, then pay rent for decades.
FY2025 revenue
$28.4B
Service revenue
23¢ of each $1
The tag
36.3× vs 22.9 usual
Figures in the cards are each company’s own, from its most recent annual filing (KLA and Lam: fiscal years ended June 2026; Applied: fiscal year ended October 2025 — note the different calendar), except the tags, which come from our standard data pull of September 15, 2026. “Service revenue” tiles show each company’s reported service revenue as a share of the revenue shown in the chart above. Shown per company; never added together.
Part three · The present — the price

Every tag on this shelf reads high — even after the markdown

A price-earnings tag — what you pay for one dollar of a company’s yearly profit — only means something against that company’s own history. All three toolmakers fell hard this summer, and all three still wear tags far above their own five-year averages. Before you read that as one verdict, check the yardsticks:

CompanyThe tag todayIts 5-yr typicalPremiumThe state of its yardstick
KLA Corporation45.8×28.9×1.58× usualThe cleanest stick on the shelf — no windfalls or fines in its record. A 45% fall from its 52-week high still leaves a 58% markup.
Lam Research47.0×26.6×1.77× usualThe dearest tag against its own history — on the most cyclical earnings of the three. Memory spending swings hardest, and its report shows what the last downcycle did to the profits under this tag.
Applied Materials36.3×22.9×1.59× usualReads as the cheapest tag on the shelf — but about a dollar in nine of the trailing earnings under it is investment-portfolio marks, not tools. Strip the marks and the tag reads higher. Its report keeps the two ledgers apart.
Price-earnings ratios computed from our standard data pull of September 15, 2026. “5-yr typical” is the data provider’s five-year mean. No forward or estimate-based multiples appear anywhere on this page or in our reports.

What survives the straightening is the real story: even after falls of 38–45% from the 52-week highs, the whole shelf still trades at 1.6 to 1.8 times its usual charge — all three names marked up together. The filings offer real reasons: record order books, AI-driven fab construction, margins at or near records. Every reason is real. Every reason is also still in the price — and a markup this broad is a verdict on the industry, not the companies. Each report prices its own company against its own history and hands the reader the choice; none of them tells you what to pay.

Part four · The watch list

Four dials, all published quarterly

The fabs’ nerve. This is the Cisco-moment detector. Equipment spending breaks the day the fabs lose theirs. The warning will not come from the three toolmakers; it comes from the capital-spending guidance of TSMC, Samsung, Micron and SK Hynix — the first quarter one of them talks about deferral instead of ramp is the quarter to re-read everything on this page.

Washington’s rules. China is the largest single geography for all three — 33% of KLA’s revenue, 34% of Lam’s, 30% of Applied’s — and export rules keep tightening. Applied is the live reminder of the stakes: a February 2026 settlement with the Commerce Department — $253 million paid, and a suspended denial order that lifts only after three years of clean compliance audits. One of the three is, in plain terms, on probation.

The order books. KLA reported $7.9B of contracted work at its fiscal-2025 year-end, Lam $2.4B of deferred revenue at fiscal-2026 year-end, Applied a $15.0B order backlog — signed demand, published every quarter. The dial to watch is not the level; it is whether the books refill as they drain.

The tags themselves. Three different businesses — an inspector, a sculptor, a general contractor — wearing markups of 1.6 to 1.8 times usual at once. That closeness says the market is currently pricing the industry, not the companies. All three report again within weeks of each other this autumn — Applied on November 12 — and each report scores its company the day the filings land.

Part five · The fund route

Own the theme in one purchase — and the one thing to know first

This is a map, not a list of picks. GARPify does not recommend any fund, is not paid by any fund company, and is not a licensed advisor. We show what exists and what each fund actually holds — so you can research it yourself or take it to your own advisor.

If the thesis convinces you and you prefer one purchase to three, all three toolmakers appear in the major semiconductor funds — they are large enough, and distinctive enough in their roles, that most broad chip funds hold all of them. The trade-off is dilution: every fund below mixes the three operators with dozens of chip designers and foundries, so a fund is a bet on the whole chip complex, with the toolmakers along for the ride.

FundFeeHow it holds the three
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor
0.35%Holds all three. Cap-weighted toward the biggest chip names (NVDA, TSMC), so the toolmakers sit lower in the weights than their role would suggest.
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor
0.35%Holds all three, with capped weights — less top-heavy than SMH, so the toolmakers get a modestly larger seat.
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor
0.19%The 30 largest US-listed chip names — all three included. Cheapest fee on this shelf.
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor
0.35%Equal-weight — every holding gets roughly the same seat at each rebalance, which favours the smaller equipment names. Weights drift between rebalances; check the provider’s current sheet.
Fees from each provider’s published materials as of the August 2026 build; each fund’s holding of the three operators re-checked against published holdings data in September 2026 (XSD’s per-name weights could not be re-verified and are not stated). Fund landscapes change; verify against the provider before relying on any row.

Want the businesses, not a blend? That is what the three company reports are for — the curve, the track record, the capital allocation, and the promises-versus-delivered record on each: KLAC LRCX AMAT

Postscript

What the stock charts say — our standard trend test

One test, one definition, every page: weekly closes against the 52-week rolling average, with the average’s direction over the last 14 weeks.

CompanyPrice, 52-week low – highEarnings per share, 52-week low – highP/E, 52-week low – high
KLAC
+3% above a rising 52-wk avg
$96.70now $168$307
$3.04now $3.67$3.67
31xnow 46x82x
LRCX
+11% above a rising 52-wk avg
$117now $271$438
$4.16now $5.76$5.76
29xnow 47x78x
AMAT
+11% above a rising 52-wk avg
$169now $421$740
$8.39now $11.60$11.60
20xnow 36x68x
Computed from daily closes to September 15, 2026. The earnings-per-share slider is the trailing figure the market carried each day (price ÷ P/E from the same pull) — Applied’s carries the investment marks its report separates out. A trend test says which way the tide is moving; it does not say what a fair price is. Nothing on this page is advice.
The Machine Behind Every Chip is a GARPify theme — a map to the full company reports, which carry the gated numbers. Sources: each company’s most recent annual filing (KLA Corporation and Lam Research, fiscal years ended June 2025; Applied Materials, fiscal year ended October 2025) and our standard data pull of September 15, 2026. GARPify publishes research, not recommendations. Nothing on this page is advice.